|
|
20 views | GoGoHub: New Search Engine To Rival Google, Craig’s List Lexington, NC, December 4, 2008-The soon-to-be launched GoGoHub website has a very lofty but achievable goal: to rival Google and Craig’s List. GoGoHub aims to rival Google and Craig’s List in terms of providing ng more benefits to its users. The online classified ad market all over the world generates nearly $100 billion every year. Google earns $19 billion in terms of ad revenues yearly. Amazon, on the other hand, generated $10.7 billion in classified ads in 2006. “While these companies are earning this much thanks to your continued patronage you can never expect them to share a larger part of their income with you,” GoGoHub Professional Marketer Vid Artukovic said. However, GoGoHub aims to rival these companies in terms of providing greater benefits and larger incomes to their members. GoGoHub positions itself as a direct competitor to Craig’s List because it offers the GoGoHub Free Classified Ads. Unlike Craig’s List though, GoGoHub will use banner ads and featured ads which adds value to the site. GoGoHub is a lso a search engine just like Google which will allow users to type in a certain keyword and do a quick Geo-Targeted search of the item they are looking for. The search is limited to the categories and subcategories indicated in the GoGoHub website. What makes GoGoHub unique and possibly bigger than Google and Craig’s List in terms of benefits given to their members, is the ability to share in the company’s growth from the beginning stages, by investing in the GoGoHub Investment Opportunity. If you are among the millions of workers who want to get away from the Bundy Clock, then take advantage of the GoGoHub Home Business 2008-12-05 05:37:14 |
French president wants to cut off file sharers’ Internet access [File Sharing]
November 23rd, 2007 at 5:18 pmSource:Valleywag
The TV writers’ strike over online-video residuals costs the Los Angeles economy $21. 3 million per day, according to nonprofit group FilmLA. The strike, which has already shut down production on shows 24, Cold Case and Desperate Housewives, keeps 15,000 from working. The last time the writers struck, in 1988, the total cost came to an estimated $500 million, or about $3 million a day.
Source:Valleywag
With all this talk of Comcast and Canadian Internet service providers throttling file-sharing connections, serial entrepreneur and twinkle-toes Mark Cuban has decided, in big, bold letters, that ISPs should “BLOCK P2P NOW.” Although he’s not a Comcast subscriber, he supports its crusade to rid the Internet of “P2P freeloaders” because he doesn’t want them eating up all his bandwidth. (As does Valleywag. Don’t like it? Lay your own cable, pikers. Cuban is a billionaire from selling Broadcast.com to Yahoo, and could actually afford to take our advice.) But we’re curious why he’s suddenly decided he has a problem with peer-to-peer software.
When he says “freeloaders,” he’s talking about companies (like Joost or Skype) that rely on peer-to-peer distribution for bandwidth. But as Ars Technica points out, Cuban was happy to finance P2P file-sharing client Grokster’s legal defense. He also invested in peer-to-peer file-distribution startup Red Swoosh, and profited when it was acquired by Akamai. His new complaints probably have more to do with the library of high-definition TV content he’s building through HDnet and his other ventures — and the fact that he needs to cozy up to Comcast for distribution, both online and in its HD lineup.
Source:Valleywag
French president Nicolas Sarkozy is endorsing a plan that would ban the provision of Internet access to file sharers caught pirating three times. The plan would use information from ISPs on “high-volume users” to find file sharers. Serial offenders would see their accounts suspended or terminated after their third strike. Music and film industries, naturally, are in favor of the plan. A consumer group in France labeled it “very harsh, potentially repressive, antieconomic and against the grain of the digital age.” Harsh words. Well, it could be worse. At least they aren’t blocking la Bible. (Photo by AP/Michel Euler)
